Every person in the Candidate window holds competence assessed by a professional body, and delivery outcomes confirmed by the sponsor who was there. They have all chosen to be found. The two things that cost you most, screening time and a bad placement, both come down to claims you cannot check. Here the hardest ones are already checked.
What you are looking at
Every profile separates what the institute has verified from what the person has stated, and the separation is enforced in the data rather than the layout. You are never guessing which half you are reading, and IPP is never quietly vouching for something nobody checked.
Sector, methodology, contract type, permanent or contract, day rate ceiling and membership grade. Narrow to people holding at least one strong-tier endorsement when a role will not tolerate a guess.
Each outcome shows the statement, the organisation, the person's role and the trust tier. Statements nobody has confirmed are shown too, marked as unconfirmed, so you are reading the whole picture rather than the flattering half.
Nobody is in the window who did not switch on open to work and publish. Every approach you make lands on someone who put themselves in front of you.
How to weigh it
One flat "verified" stamp would be easier to build and would tell you less. Each endorsement carries the tier it earned, so you can weight it yourself rather than take our word for the lot.
The sponsor confirmed from a work email matching the organisation the outcome was delivered at. The signal to lean on.
A real, identifiable person confirmed it from a personal address. Worth something, shown as the lighter badge it is.
The candidate's own statement, shown and labelled. Never presented as verified, and never hidden either.
An endorsement that says "delivered, but three months late" is recorded exactly that way. A sponsor who tells the truth produces a more useful record than one who rubber-stamps, and the flow is built to make honesty the easy option. Edit an endorsed claim and it goes back for fresh confirmation, so a badge always reflects something a real person stood behind.
Getting access
We are onboarding the first agencies by hand, alongside the first candidates, so terms are agreed in a conversation rather than pushed through a checkout. Access is granted to your organisation, so your consultants search with their normal Module Six sign-in and you are not buying seats one by one. Self-serve subscription and placement commission follow once the first cohort is running.
Candidates are told plainly that access is granted per agency and that nobody browses the window casually. That is part of why they publish, so we intend to keep it true.
Tell us the kind of roles you place and we will set your organisation up with access to the window.